Clive spoke in the debate and expressed his scepticism over the Prime Minister’s claim that there were 70,000 “moderate” Syrian ground troops on the ground ready to attack Daesh’s forces supported by allied airstrikes. No reliable source outside of government circles agrees with that assessment. People from all sides of this debate agree that Daesh cannot be defeated by a bombing campaign alone. Without ground forces everyone seems to accept that the bombing will have little impact on Daesh and instead of pushing the organisation back it could make matters worse.
Clive also highlighted the need for the fairer treatment of the Sunni minority in Iraq which has been one of the key driving forces leading to the rise of Daesh. Dealing with this issue is more crucial than any bombs, but it received little attention in the recent debate.
Speaking after the vote, Clive said: “Like everyone who took part in the debate, I want to defeat the terrorists. However, I do not believe the strategy outlined by the Government will achieve this and so I could not support them. In some ways I hope I am wrong and that events show the government’s strategy to be the right one. However, I fear that this is not going to be the outcome and that we risk gradually getting drawn further into the conflict.”
For a more detailed explanation of why Clive voted against the motion please see here.